Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Opinions Split On Impact Of SUPCO Ruling Barring Local Fracking Bans

The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision that local communities can’t use zoning ordinances to keep out oil and gas drillers has communities, activists and lobbyists speculating on what it might mean for the future. Ohio Public Radio's Karen Kasler reports.  

The court split 4-3, saying Munroe Falls in Summit County couldn’t block Beck Energy from drilling on a residential property with permission of the owner and a permit from the Department of Natural Resources. The majority ruled that state law bans local communities from passing ordinances specifically aimed at obstructing drilling activities.  Bans have passed in several communities, including Athens, Broadview Heights in suburban Cleveland, Mansfield, Oberlin and Yellow Springs.  Chief among the group of organizations approving of the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision is the Ohio Oil and Gas Association. Executive vice president Shawn Bennett says the court was correct in deciding that the permitting experts at ODNR are the right ones to decide where drilling should be done – because local officials don’t have the expertise to oversee a complex and technical industry. And Bennett says these local laws prohibiting drilling were pointless anyway. 
“Honestly, those bans were obsolete when they were passed – you know, those were, at the most, ceremonial bans. So all this court ruling does is reaffirm what was already in state laws. Those bans, even though they were passed, really weren’t doing anything. All they are is a ceremonial effort.”

But those who are worried about possible detrimental after-effects of drilling and hydraulic fracturing or fracking don’t see these bans as pointless, but as an essential tool of democracy. Dick McGinn is the coordinator of the Ohio Community Rights Network in Athens County, and worked to pass the ban there. McGinn says this is about the civil rights of residents of communities that don’t want drilling, and taking that position is going to make it hard for the state to continue to fight these local bans. 
“If we have to go to court on this, the industry and the state will have to argue that we have no rights. Now that was not a matter for discussion in the Munroe Falls case. It will be in our case.”

The Munroe Falls case involved a permitting process on the local level, which is overridden by the permitting process on the state level. And for that reason, some critics of the decision say they think it’s very narrow, and that the door is open to those who want to make different arguments on local fracking bans. Nathan Johnson is an attorney with the Ohio Environmental Council. 
“Local governments, particularly cities across the state, should feel somewhat emboldened by this decision and feel strongly about crafting some ordinance language that would allow zoning – though, of course, they’d have to be careful about it, but I think they do have the hint there that they would succeed in court if they go about it properly.”

But those who would go to court will likely face an uphill battle from business groups who support the ruling from the Ohio Supreme Court. Among the groups that filed paperwork in support of the state and the energy industry was the Youngstown-Warren Regional Chamber of Commerce, which estimates the area has seen $4 billion in economic development from shale in the last five years. Voters there have rejected four previous fracking bans, and chamber spokesman Guy Coviella said he feels the decision will stop a fifth one. 
“We’ve fought four charter amendments to the Youngstown chamber based on the possibility that it can be locally controlled. So this ruling supports our position that it should not be on the ballot again – it’s very costly for us to be on the ballot for us.”

And Coviella says his members are residents, so they’re concerned about possible safety issues from fracking, including earthquakes that have been reported in the area. But he says ODNR has been monitoring these issues closely and has been strict in its regulation, and he adds that the chamber is fine with bans on specific types of operations or in specific locations. 


The Statehouse News Bureau was founded in 1980 to provide educational, comprehensive coverage of legislation, elections, issues and other activities surrounding the Statehouse to Ohio's public radio and television stations. To this day, the Bureau remains the only broadcast outlet dedicated to in-depth coverage of state government news and topics of statewide interest. The Bureau is funded througheTech Ohio, and is managed by ideastream. The reporters at the Bureau follow the concerns of the citizens and voters of Ohio, as well as the actions of the Governor, the Ohio General Assembly, the Ohio Supreme Court, and other elected officials. We strive to cover statehouse news, government issues, Ohio politics, and concerns of business, culture and the arts with balance and fairness, and work to present diverse voices and points of view from the Statehouse and throughout Ohio. The three award-winning journalists at the bureau have more than 60 combined years of radio and television experience. They can be heard on National Public Radio and are regular contributors to Morning Edition, All Things Considered and Marketplace. Every weekday, the Statehouse News Bureau produces in-depth news reports forOhio's public radio stations. Those stories are also available on this website, either on the front page or in our archives. Weekly, the Statehouse News Bureau produces a television show from our studios in the Statehouse. The State of Ohio is an unique blend of news, interviews, talk and analysis, and is broadcast on Ohio's public television stations. The Statehouse News Bureau also produces special programming throughout the year, including the Governor's annual State of the State address to the Ohio General Assembly and a five-part year-end review.
Related Content