Local school board races throughout Ohio that drew attention for their nasty tone, their nationally driven agenda and their eye-popping fundraising from outside sources didn’t translate into major changes in most cases.
Ohio’s Republican U.S. Senate candidates raised money and supported some candidates. Jane Timken, for example, backed 42 candidates, paying for robocalls, texting services and more. And her candidates lost in many places including Gahanna, Hilliard, Hudson, Parma, Rocky River, Bay Village, Beavercreek and Olentangy.
It’s not just candidates she supported who lost. A candidate in the Olentangy School district who received financial support from the wife of fellow Republican U.S. Senate candidate Bernie Moreno also lost. Other GOP US Senate contenders and conservative political groups invested in school board candidates who made what they called “critical race theory” and masks in K-12 schools the centerpieces of their campaigns. They lost, particularly in suburban areas.
“My own sense is that voters resent this kind of national in-road into school board races.”
That’s Paul Beck, political science professor at Ohio State University. He says that was especially true of voters in urban and suburban areas.
“They may be more aware of the nature of these contests and where the pressures and the money are coming from. It also could be just, we are talking about a polarized America, with people living in rural areas much more inclined to be supportive of the Trump agenda, the Republican agenda, the conservative agenda. People who live in urban and suburban areas are much less inclined to be supportive.”
Former Ohio Democratic Party Chairman David Pepper says he thinks the election gave parents who’ve stayed out of politics a way to finally speak out on things like COVID protocols.
“There’s been a silent majority for more than a year that actually thinks having kids wear masks makes sense because it will keep their kids safe. They don’t want to have their schools taken over by the same extreme politics that we see at the Statehouse. And despite all of the yelling and screaming and, even worse, threats at these school board meetings, that silent majority showed up and said, ‘enough.’”
Aaron Baer is the head of the Center for Christian Virtue, a group that advocated for some of the candidates who ran on conservative ideals. He says he has a couple of takeaways from the outcomes.
“One, overall, you just saw much more engagement in the election process throughout the state and across the country and for an off-year election like this which is generally a good thing. And you saw some parents really stand up and have their voices heard. But I think the big lesson here is, for those parents who really concerned about seeing systematic reform in education, you need something like the ‘backpack bill.’”
The so called “Backpack bill” would expand Ohio’s existing school voucher program to allow anyone, regardless of income or address, to use state dollars to send their kids to private or religious school. It would also allow dollars for home-schooling. And public school advocates say that will would take hundreds of millions of dollars away from public education by decreasing the amount of state money available.
Political scientist Beck says he thinks the school choice message resonated in the governor’s race in Virginia where Democrat Terry McAuliffe was defeated by Republican Glenn Youngkin, who was supported by former President Trump.
“So I think we can expect the conservative forces, particularly Trump supporters and forces to continue to try to use those issues as wedges to try to use those issues as wedges to continue to try to influence school boards and put their supporters on these school boards.”
And in two years, when more candidates come up for re-election to their school boards, Trump himself might be on the ballot as well.
